Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Nov 3, 2011 11:36am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: This is what you said:

OK, as you say last comments, right?

First, $100 bills are in the minority (read the study).

Second, big change in rate of contamination from early 70s to "now" (see study and others).

Last, and most important, when I "reacted" it was to your comment above that "...Vapors, no offense, but it is naive to think hunter did not have that as one of his intended meanings. Maybe your just not familiar with that scene and the lingo, so you don't recognize that as one of the possible meanings. But I guarantee you hunter wanted some people to interpret as a song about cocaine. Don't kid yourself."

This is not saying "one interpretation"; this is YOU saying "Hunter intended it..."

We now agree that's not true, right? I rest my case, whether you want to go along with it or not, but you've waffled from "he meant it this way" to "I interpret it..." and I was always only arguing with the former, not the latter.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rdenirojb87 Date: Nov 3, 2011 11:56am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: This is what you said:

gotcha. i should have stated myself better. this thread is making me jaded. last comment indeed. peace wt.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)